One of the most intriguing stars in the universe is right here on Earth: the eleven pairs of pink fleshy appendages ringing the snout of the star-nosed mole. From its appearance and location, one would think this star might be a supersensitive olfactory organ, helping the nearly blind mole negotiate its subterranean environment, or an extra hand for grasping prey or manipulating objects. Some researchers have hypothesized that the star detects electric fields, thus acting as a kind of antenna. But in reality, the star is an extraordinary touch organ with more than 25,000 minute sensory receptors, called Eimers organs, with which this hamster-sized mole feels its way around. Under a microscope, the Eimers organs appear in a honeycombed pattern of tiny epidermal domes, each sensitive to the slightest touch. Although the star is less than half an inch across, its surface is supplied with more than 100,000 large nerve fibers. By comparison, the touch receptors in the human hand are equipped with only about 17,000 of these fibers. Imagine having six times the sensitivity of your entire hand concentrated in a single fingertip.
Together with Jon Kaas, also of Vanderbilt University, I have been investigating how the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata) uses this exquisitely sensitive organ to explore its dark, damp world. (This North American species is unique in its preference for wetlands, where it digs tunnels and forages mostly in mud and water.) First the mole samples an area by touching the ground with all twenty-two appendages. Its brain processes this information in less than a twentieth of a second. If one of the appendages detects anything of potential interest (often an unfortunate earthworm or other invertebrate), the mole moves its nose slightly to bring the lowermost central pair into contact with the object. The Eimers organs on this pair are particularly well supplied with nerves and can provide the animal with a higher-resolution image, enabling the mole to know whether it has encountered something good to eat or should keep searching. For small prey, the entire processfrom first touch by peripheral appendage to swift ingestiontakes just about a fifth of a second. The star-nosed mole continuously scans its environment with its nose, much as we constantly shift our eyes to perceive the world around us. Usually humans and most other visual mammals initially detect the important parts of a scene through peripheral vision and then shift their eyes so that the central part of the retina, the fovea, can provide a more detailed image. (If youre not convinced of this, try reading this sentence without moving your eyes.) The visual areas of the brainparticularly those in the cerebral cortexthat are devoted to processing information from this tiny but vital region are much larger than the areas that handle information from the lower-resolution, peripheral regions of the retina. The touch centers of the star-nosed moles brain are organized similarly, with much more space in the cerebral cortex assigned to dealing with input from the central appendages of the star than from each of the less important peripheral appendages. Handling information this way conserves neural tissue, because it concentrates most of the brains computing power on only a small part of the sensory world at any given moment. Some scanning time might be saved if large areas of the brain received high-resolution data from the entire star (or from your entire visual field), but to do this, the brain would have to be gigantic.
Most animal appendages (including antennae, wings, legs, fins, and arms) start out as simple extensions of the body wallessentially as direct outgrowths of the embryonic tissue. Moreover, similar genes are expressed during the early development of appendages in animals as different as humans, fish, birds, and insects. This suggests that a basic program for appendage outgrowth evolved hundreds of millions of years ago and has been redeployed many times in the course of evolution. But what about the star-nosed moles novel snout appendages? While we do not yet know the genes involved, we have been able to document the mechanics of the stars development. As it turns out, the stars appendages develop unlike those in any other animal, suggesting that it had unique precursors and an entirely independent evolutionary history.
Working in collaboration with Kaas and Glenn Northcutt, of the University of California, San Diego, I examined star-nosed mole embryos at various stages of development. We quickly found that all but the very earliest embryos have a protostar (as well as huge embryonic forelimbs destined to become the digging arms of the adult mole), but that instead of forming as outgrowths of the embryonic nose, the stars twenty-two appendages first appear as slight, elongated swellings on the embryonic face. In later stages, when the swellings are more pronounced, it almost looks as if the star has been folded back against the side of the face. This impression is not quite accurate but does foreshadow events to come. During most of the moles embryonic development, nothing separates the swellings from the side of its face. But just before birth, a new layer of epidermis grows underneath the swellings. At this point, the appendages become separate cylinders, though they are still attached to the face by this new skin.
The developmental sequence of the star differs from the way other animal appendages are known to form. In his book The Blind Watchmaker, biologist Richard Dawkins gives examples of unusual developmental sequences in other animals, such as the sole, a bony flatfish that spends most of its life lying on one side and has both its eyes on the upward-facing side of its head. As a young sole develops, it essentially pulls one eye across its face, grotesquely distorting its skull and facial musculature. This awkward process makes sense only when we appreciate that flatfish were not designed carefully and then created, but rather evolved from upright fish that had symmetrical bodies. As Dawkins points out, the ancestors of flatfish must have begun their evolutionary journey by lying on their side on the ocean floora position that would have resulted in one eye facing the bottom. In each subsequent generation, the most successful offspring would have been those in which the eye shifted slightly closer to the other side of the face. Today we can read the course of this evolution in the development of a flatfish.
What clues does the unusual development of C. cristatas star provide about the evolution of this animal? Perhaps the ancestors of the star-nosed mole had strips of Eimers organs along the side of the face, and perhaps, in the course of evolutionary time, these strips slowly elevated and eventually peeled forward to form separate appendages. If so, the stages of this evolutionary sequence may have been conserved in the present sequence of embryonic development. While this explanation of the scenario seems reasonable, we cant be certain of it without further evidence. Hoping that an analysis of living species could provide insights into the star-nosed moles past, we began to examine other moles from around the world.
The coast mole, of course, is not ancestral to the star-nosed mole; in fact, the two are not even especially closely related. But the existence of the coast moles proto-appendages supports the proposition that the ancestors of the star-nosed mole had similar structures. Embryonic development in the coast mole stops at the proto-appendage stage but continues in the star-nosed mole, leading to the unfolding of separate appendages that form the marvel of sensitivity we see today. Every spring, Kenneth Catania travels from the Tennessee campus of Vanderbilt University, where he is a research assistant professor in the psychology department, to the wetlands of Maryland and Pennsylvania. There, in addition to star-nosed moles, he inevitably encounters shrews, voles, weasels, field mice, and the occasional snapping turtle. Catanias interest in star-nosed moles began more than a decade ago, when he was working with small mammals at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. His current research focuses on brain organization and behavior in mammalsincluding hedgehogs and opossums as well as moleswith an emphasis on cerebral cortex function. Recipient of the 1998 Capranica Foundation Award and the International Society of Neuroethologists 1998 Young Investigator Award, Catania is also interested in how complex brains have evolved. Online Extra: Star-nosed Moles, Master Builders Copyright © 2000 American Museum of Natural History | |||||||||||||||||||||||